Jess♥

maybe it's because of the crappy week I've been having.... well I have been thinking about this. I can't remember who said it but somebody mentioned Apocalypses intellect. now this is part of the character I really have no clue about. I've always thought of him as a behemoth but maybe this just shows my ignorance and he is actually much much more than his physical stature. I am surely a victim of my nostalgia goggles. I remember something from my childhood and as vague and fuzzy as it is, I hold onto it dearly. but having considered what was said about his intellect... I think I have no idea what this film will actually be like. similar to days of future past, it's difficult to gauge from the trailer alone. So I will do the same as I did with that one. I'll wait and see how people respond to it. and if it has really good reputation then I might go to watch it in the theatre.

I dunno, was I harsh? I wasn't trying to be super harsh. but anyhow, while i like hugh jackman, I hated him as wolverine. I personally always feel like these movies look down on the comic books. like in the first movie, they said "what do you expect, blue and yellow spandex?" in first class, it seemed like they lost that arrogance and embraced the comics. but this movie looks like they are becoming arrogant again and looking down on the comics. that's just the feeling I get from it. I don't read teh comics or anything, I only had one or two when i was little, but I think that characters need a certain amount of respect. I mean, just look at the hulk in avengers. I really don't think it's asking a lot for a character to be an appropriate size.

bad decision to go with a real human for apocalypse. bad, bad decision. i guess they wanted to favour a good performance by the actor....... Stupid Stupid people. it just looks mediocre at best. Apocalypse was consistently a giant. in all the animation or comics I have seen, apocalypse was always at least 7 foot tall. and 3 feet wide. I've watched every marvel cinematic universe movie in the cinema. i give them my moneys because they make things look proper. this movie won't get my monies. I doubt i'd even want to watch this via a torrent site. don't even want to give it the time of day.

Well in any case it's not doomsday from the comic book. But Lex in this movie can call it what he likes. There's no denying it looks more like doomsday than anything. But I was thinking that this may be a precursor or foreshadowing. I think bringing actual doomsday in at this point would be foolish. I mean that was the first thing I thought when I saw it. Doomsday. It's just that the story doesn't fit. And I probably wouldn't have queried it if lordspleach hadn't mentioned bizarro. The origin of bizarro was the thing zod did to make duplicates of himself. And lex is using zods body and the birthing pods in the downed kryptonian ship.

perhaps not 'bizarro superman' but something akin to it. because i may not know much about comics, but I know that doomsday was made on krypton by scientists in ancient times. and the process took decades. I read that comic book, one of the very few I have read. he wasn't made from a modern kryptonian, certainly not one of the calibre of zod, which is what we are led to believe is used as the basis for this thing. also, when we look at doomsday in the comic books, I find it hard to believe that they would do such a terrible job of designing him. I mean yeah there is bone protrusions... but doomsday is freakin crazy looking.

having said that, it is reminiscent of doomsday which suggests where they are going. they are linking doomsday to a kryptonian aberration. this may mean that we are going to see a third movie featuring doomsday.

quick google research on bizarro, agrees with you Spleach original bizarro was created from zod, and later versions were created by lex luthor.

it's a pretty intense issue that does reflect quite strongly on our times. it's part of the argument for or against surveillance or the control of the state. many people think the government is our protector and looks after us, keeps us safe, that everything they do is for the greater good. others are more distrusting and believe the government has our worst interests at heart. it's very deep seated issues of freedom versus safety etc. it goes to the core of our society and the things we are worried about a lot these days. I wish I could explain more elegantly, my brain is a bit slow right now.

Hello Jessica Kendrick, This email is to notify you that the following invoice with HostGator.com has been generated which reflects the new recurring price for the products you have purchased. In an effort to ensure best in class service and top-notch server performance, this invoice reflects the new increased recurring price for this product.

is that an image?? I thought it was a tickbox. never used it ^^: I was gonna keep an eye on this but I totally forgot about it. can use the default skin for now but I need to change the logo to be in hte background or summink. I'll probably forget again. maybe if you bug me about it, I'll remember. it's because I lose notifications and then i have so many othr things to do.

So, it seems that my theory had some credence after all... It seems I was walking in einsteins footsteps without realising it.

ok, I just checked on it. I don't see any reason why most people would need more and I want to make sure there isn't too much data. I think member++ can be trusted with this enormous responsibility though. you should be able to do what you wanted now.

yeah that's a real problem. it seems ridiculous that the default behaviour fora logo bigger than a certain amount of pixels would cause such a bad layout issue. another reason why I don't like IPB. what is teh smallest resolution? what size do you think I'm limited to?

yeah you're dead right. courage for sure! I was crying so much last night because I wished I didn't have to stop seeing him. but a relationship needs kissing and cuddling and more intimate things. It's difficult to go out there and make myself vulnerable but it's the only way to find happiness.

ok I saw him again today. we spent a good 6 hours together. we talked a lot and had a nice time. but I realised that there were definitely no sparks. it's not that I don't feel comfortable or wasn't relaxed enough. I mean I was very relaxed for sure. we spent a lot of time just lying and talking and stuff. I trust him and I like him and he really is a great guy. It's a shame because I wish I felt something but I can't change who I am. I don't suppose it means I am a lesbian, I might find another guy who i feel sparks with, but he did help me to realise that I need to either find someone who is celibate or I need to be okay interacting completely with my body how it currently is. so, I guess it's best that I just stay single until I can get things completely sorted.

batteries don't discharge very quickly. zoacrystals are capable of discharging massive amounts of energy in an instant. that is what super-capacitors do. also, producing energy.... it still needs to hold a charge because generating energy takes work and takes time. when zoalords go in a processing tube they are given lots of energy. remember when imakarum was in the pod on silha? he got recharged with energy from the ark.

I believe it has been explicitly stated that zoacrystals act as compressors? it seems to me that a zoacrystal is pretty much a super-capacitor.

wow, that is pretty awesome!! comgratulations!

ok, well i get scared sometimes when thinking about these things because I start to convince myself that I don't really exist. I don't like that. but then, given the nature of infinity, I also think it's impossible for me to not exist. I find that there are too many contradictions... so much so that I like to fall back on tao wisdom. that which can be named is not the true tao. this means that the true nature of the universe is not able to be understood. and that is something I find to be true. maths and physics etc are nice simulations, but they can never truly solve it. even circles don't exit. pi is irrational, it cannot be defined therefore a circle is an undefinable concept. it is not a real thing.

thanks, that does make me feel better. I'll just have to think about what I really want. you are right. if he is worth it he will be patient.

I think you're right. I think maybe he was a bit too forward and it scared me. I'm pretty sure I liked when he held my hand. it was only as he continued to be affectionate, I started to feel put off. I think maybe I just need to move very slowly. but will a guy really be patient? I mean isn't that off-putting to guys?

i think we have similar ideas. but I'm really sorry my mind is a mess right now. I had a date tonight and I'm mega confused. so I can't really muster up more than a few words.

I'm just gonna copy and paste what i wrote on facebook. different day, different guy. so I had my second date this time. now... this guy was more forward and confident. he held my hand. it made me dizzy and felt odd. so I think that is a good thing. but it was scary. also, I actually kissed him goodnight. I didn't mind it. I wouldn't say I wanted to do that more. so now I'm confused and I feel like crying. I like the guy and we get along well. we have talked a lot. but maybe I just want friends, and maybe the ways i was feeling was more to do with automatic responses rather than whether or not I liked him? how do you even tell? honestly if I think about spending more time with him, I feel scared. I feel like it is something that is very difficult. I feel like I don't want to. I should trust that. but why? am I just scared or do I just genuinely not like him in that way? so confused.

well unfortunately I am dyslexic so I can't really take in that much information and process it i any useful way. but I did think I would share what I thought about today. I took my thoughts further. previously I believed that I only knew one thing. :- I am. but actually I know something else. I know that I do not know (some things, everything etc. ) so that is proof of duality. I am == 1 duality == 2 I decided to take it further and see if I knew any more. I came upon a rather flaky thought and haven't really tested it an awful lot, but I surmised that since I know 1 and I know 2, then I can consider those things together and know 3. i am and duality. since those things cannot be divided equally, I know variation. variation == 3 ? I'm not sure about 3 though. I'd have to give it more thought. anyway, I still don't know if I addressed your topic properly? did I ? p.s. yes I did read your post and I appreciate your responses. I am very befuddled though so can't really respond directly. sorry

honestly I find it difficult to follow your post. I think you have done a lot more study than I have. but I will expand on what I wrote earlier. essentially all we know for sure is that we are us. I mean, I only know that I am. aside from me being me, I don't know anything else. such as the description of what 'me' is. a human? I don't actually know that. I only know that information comes to me. but I don't know where it comes from. it may be all imagined from this one central place that is me. (from my point of view of course) therefore the only universal truth is the number 1. this is in fact, the essence of god. "I AM". That is what the words mean as written in hte original hebrew of the christian bible. it's also the foundation of other religions. building from there, we have a question. yes or no. is or isn't. being or not being. exists or not exists. yin and yang. light and dark. 1 and 0. the interplay of these gives rise to what I consider to be 'spin'. this 'spin' is the foundation of matter and three dimensional space. spin is what gives rise to all the forces we know of. what is electromagnetic energy for example? it is the spin of a magnetic field that creates electric flow. these are also opposite forces. so when we come to maths, the very basic form of maths, that is 1 and 0, is the foundation of our reality. the rest of it is useful but I'm uncertain as to how real it is. let's take pi as an example. it is undefinable therefore it doesn't actually exist. if you try to show it to someone you will have the wrong thing. it exists outside of reality and is not real. other mathematical principles and principles of logic are actually not real. like statistics. I hate statistics. there are people say that there is a 80% chance of something happening, but I see that as utter crap. there is only 1 chance. either it will or it won't. there is no other alternatives. any given event only has a 50/50 chance of happening at any point in time. the frequency of past occurences of the event has no bearing on what will happen at this point in time. stars burn. for billions of years. then they explode. statistically, a star has a very low chance of exploding, but it happens. what chance is there that I will type the word yes right now. 100% chance, I just did it. but this time I didn't type it. there was a zero percent chance. what happens, happens or it does not. so that is another mathematical concept that does not work. this doesn't mean these things don't have a place i our world. statistics effect expectation and expectation effects attitude and attitude effects outcomes. there is also quantum dynamics that says how our perception of things effects the fabric of reality. I'm not really sure if I fully answered your initial post but this is the foundation for my thinking right now. if I haven't answered fully then please help me to understand how to properly address it. in laymen's terms please, I'm dyslexic.