Jess♥

Shou only detected Gastahl because of a 'blind spot.' it's pointless anyway because aptom hardly has enough energy to walk. he certainly can't use any special abilities. I also need to point out that aptom is not stupid. he's not going to act hostile towards Val in his current condition.

since they are at the base of the antenna, that makes sense.

why would val fight him then? what could she possibly gain from fighting a zoanoid trhat she's only seen once and has no idea of his allegiances? i wanted to make comment on Aptom's abilities too. I believe it takes him some small effort to retreive specific abilities and activate them. I don't think his current form can have all his abilities at the ready. I think if he retreives zxtoles wings for example, he may lose out on some other ability. I think it's a matter of balance. like a meal. you have to get a fine balance of the ingredients or the resulting meal will taste bad.

that 'scientist' is stupid. he things it looks like some kind of dog??? stupid. it looks more like a possum than a dog. I like Firey's from Labyrinth. except I don't like them because they freak me out.

forgetting the fact that Apollon's armour is not of earth and made out of guyver control metal material? high chance that spollon's armour IS Guyver.

it crossed my mind earlier today. Valkyria probably doesn't know who aptom is. Apollon didn't know and he has access to a lot of info. probably more than guyot has access to. and up until the mansion incident, she had not seen him. if she recognised anything about him from a prior incident, it would be the fact that he helped her to win her fight by hte airport. (recognised from his ice power) the incident at the mansion, aptom appeared and opposed apollon, I don't think there was any action by aptom that would have made valkyria think he was her enemy.

I can't do that personally. conflict of interest.

yeah, at the end of teh day, wikipedia cannot be relied upon as a rock solid source. it is good for getting a good grounding in a subject and to be used as a stepping stone, but so much information on there is inaccurate or just outright wrong. i've corrected a lot of articles on there in passing. on random things from chemistry to dentistry etc.

thanks for your thoughts. I think I might agree with you there, the word normal could actually be more like saying 'drone' or 'sheep' or 'automaton'. the kind of people who don't think for themselves and are not much more than a livestock for advertisers.

probably more to do with hte fact that it was mostly orginal research. wikipedia needs to be verifiable which is why I replaced the incorrect information and added a reference.

best way is to check relax point. just had a peek. yeah that is shonen ace.

ZN_aptom_human.jpg What? rouge is the french word for red [emote=monkey]z024[/emote] Ha, ha. Laugh at the American for not knowing languages. I meant rogue. hey guys, I'm not gettig at ya, I've seen that error numerous times thats why I couldn't resist that little joke. honestly, this says very little about you guys and says a lot about the american education system. no, you're not giving your country a bad name, your country gave you a bad name if anything.

ZN_aptom_human.jpg What? rouge is the french word for red [emote=monkey]z024[/emote]

I think that is pretty desirable. some men can get pretty intense and it can be quite intimidating. I have often thought what kind of guy I would go for if I were interested in Men that way. Thor comes to mind. but yeah, I think the type of man that is most attractive is the type who is not so interested in sex, someone who has a strong heart, who is calm and strong and thoughtful.

that's what I was gonna say. aptom is exhausted. what is most interesting though is what dialogue they could have. I am surprised more hasn't been said about that. Aptom used to be Shou's enemy. Valkyrie is hunting Shou just like Aptom used to. the interchange between the two could yield a very interesting result.

I hadn't questioned it either. actually some things were disguised. for example a lot of desire I have for women, I figured that was always just sexual attraction, but I have realised a lot of it is jealousy. I'm only mentioning it for your consideration. I'm not trying to make any assertions.

chernaudi, The reason why I asked you earlier if you felt your outer self reflected the inner you, is because a lot of the things you have said sound like a lot of the things I have experienced in my life. I grew up being told I was a boy and I never questioned it, I believed it was true. sure there are parts of me that look a fair bit different from most guys you see in porn etc, but then I figured they always choose the 'perfect specimen' for those type of movies, right? Anyhow, it turns out they were wrong, I was wrong. so that is why I asked because there is a chance you might experience something similar.

yep, that's right. goths present as goths because that is who they are and they want to express their inner self in that way. the reaction of other people towards them is not really the relevant factor. that is due to prejudice and misunderstanding, it's not an issue of people expressing their inner beauty,

by the way, personalitywise... I just wanna point out, I know plenty of women who act masculine in many ways so when you say def. not a woman in personality, that might be true or not depending on what perspective you take. what matters there though is what makes you comfortable.

well those are feminine aspects aren't they? I dunno, I mean you could call that a guy with feminine aspects. My questions was more sort of, do you look like your personality, I mean some guys who are gay, might hide their true personality by dressing up really butch etc, when actually they are a camp effeminate gay guy. some straight guys who are effeminate in some ways, might hide that because they think it would make people think they are gay.

Do you think your looks reflect who you truly are?

You're kidding me!!! damn, I was going off the first time I saw it on a CGI marketplace I was a member of. I think it was renderosity and the company was called shapeways. They said their technology was new and they were really basic with some kind of resin that printed in a kind of a sandbox. I think that was 2006 or thereabouts. I can't believe it's been that long and I never heard about it before that. In any case, I can see this technology accelerating in it's growth. I honestly think we will see more availability of these printers sooner than standard prediction models. I mean, we're already seeing the first licenses being readied for driverless cars. who saw that coming? I certainly didn't. I thought driverless cars were still several years off.

that's where consoles suck and why I don't plan on joining this generation of consoles. There are plenty of games that come out on PS4 that would run just fine on PS3. they are literally that simple that they could run very easily on it, and yet no person who already owns a sony console can play that game unless they upgrade. maybe people don't mind about the graphics quality? maybe people would be happy to play games in PS3 quality and not have extra FPS etc. there is literally NO REASON to have different consoles unless there is a drastic difference in capabilities. With the difference between SNES and N64 there was a definite advantage to the new machine. the old one COULD NOT have done the things that the newer one did. there was a damn good reason to upgrade. new things were possible and the whole experience was vastly improved. but the difference between PS3 and PS4 is negligible. The whole issue of separate platforms is just stupid now. Let's look at smart phones. any game that comes out on the market place will run on my phone. even though there is now an S5, the games all run on my S3. all the old ones will run and the new ones will run on any device. maybe the older devices will struggle with newer games but that's not really my point. in that case, there is a definite reason to upgrade. PC is kinda the same but it is of course WAY more modular. So .... In short I agree with your point. Although I approached it from a different angle, the theory is still the same. games should work on each version of a platform in this day and age because there is not reason to lock them out. If you own a game, you should be able to play it within reason on what ever system you have. old games should work on the new system, and if the programming is not functional, they can release a patch. but the patch is to attract new customers of the game, not a standalone software to be sold. I would sooner emulate a game I already own on PC rather than pay for a digital copy. If I already own the game then I have a legal right to own a backup copy.

actually graphene is very easy to produce. it can be made using household products. large scale productions will e needed to be developed of course, but it really isn't some exotic thing to be carefully refined. carbon is everywhere and the graphite used to make pencils is not really difficult to get. do pencils really cost a lot of money? not really. here is the process by which a factory could easily produce massive quantities of graphene. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27113732 and here is the printing mechanism that will be available to all of us in the near future. this is not far out crazy futuristic stuff 100s of years from now. this is happening now. within the next several years. I mean, 3d printing didn't even exist 10 years ago.