August 6, 200619 yr The Warrior Guyver concept is basically a Guyver Unit intentionally designed for war while the original Guyver Unit was not intentionally created for war and only became a bio-weapon because the host already was one. The name Guyver itself means "Out of Control" or "Beyond the Norm" But some fans have complained that the name Warrior Guyver is redundant because they think the Guyver is already a warrior. So the question is do you think the name Warrior Guyver is redundant and why?
August 6, 200619 yr No i dont think that the Warrior Guyver name is redundant because for one it sounds cool and second it seperates a Warrior Unit from a normal Guyver which was more or less an accidental weapon where as the Warrior Units are not. PS Anyone who thinks its a stupid name should be drop in a pit with six rabid Gregoles
August 6, 200619 yr Of course not, the Warrior Guyver name should remain. It's like saying should we classify a black man and a white man as being the same and make the titles black and white redundant. (no offence intended). There are various differences in these two that make them apart of their own culture or "race"...other than the obvious skin variation and slightly different bloodlines. There are differences even tho they are both classified as human. Same as with the guyvers. There is a distinct difference between a regular unit and the warrior unit specifically engineered for war, as Destroyer indicated as well. Another example a navy's battleships. Yes they are all battleships as a general term but they are each placed in classes that are unique to their purposes. Eg, a Dreadnought class battle ship is one that is designed for heavy combat and assaults with guns and missles and cannons. Carriers are designed for their name sake; carrying armaments (planes, equipment etc).
August 6, 200619 yr No i dont think that the Warrior Guyver name is redundant because for one it sounds cool and second it seperates a Warrior Unit from a normal Guyver which was more or less an accidental weapon where as the Warrior Units are not.PS Anyone who thinks its a stupid name should be drop in a pit with six rabid Gregoles I agree with that as well. It seperates the unit we know and love and Jason's.
August 6, 200619 yr I don't know, I don't think it's redundant because of the whole a guyver is already to a warrior which isn't true. ie sho, sean's girlfriend who at the moment can't remember her name, Scot, Max. None of them were really warriors and minus Max they still arn't yah I know they all kick butt but still their still not very warrior like. But even so I can't say that the name warrior guyver is all that good true it is a cool name but still, if I remeber correctly the orginal consipt the creators were tring to create a control unit with the power equal to that of a human merged with a control unit. The warrior unit while it's power is greater then a standard unit it doesn't nessisarraly make the person in to a warrior I think its a bit of a miss nomer.
August 7, 200619 yr Author Well the warrior units CM's also link each warrior Guyver to each other so they can fight in unison. So no matter how many they are they will never accidently hit each other and will always fight in co-ordination. The Warrior CM also augments the host mind, providing real time combat tactical perception, enhancing host aggression factor, and giving the host unlimited stamina. Even the ability to think faster than normal. Not to mention the ability to tell friend from foe, even in self defense mode. Basically the unit's are made for War but yeah that doesn't necessarily make them warriors per say. Some on other boards had voiced their complaints about the fiction and I just wanted to know what you all think being the main fans of the ficiton.
August 7, 200619 yr In my opinion its a perfectly logical step forward. Obviously there are some drawbacks on the original guyver so why not try to improve on them? I'd think the Creators, being as advanced and dominating as they are would actually want to improve on the design even if it was a mistake initially. The whole guyver thing needs diversity. You stick to one thing and it tends to get old. Warrior Guyver is just a deviant of the original concept. One of many possibly variations.
August 9, 200619 yr There is nothing that suggests the normal Guyver is a warrior. It just makes them out of control. It's like saying some harmless crazy person is a warrior. Guyver 1 is a forced warrior in a way. The additional abilities the Warrior unit has over the standard unit makes it more warrior-like than a standard Guyver.
August 10, 200619 yr Did you want to call him Guyver 4? I mean when the original guy can only come up with cool names like 1 2 and 3, any spontaneity and originality goes right out the window! I mean you could have called him Guyver Blue and it still would have been applicable! Warrior Guyver rocks!
September 9, 200718 yr dropped in a pit of rabid Gregoles? lol! Nah, those things are so easy to kill you could sneeze on one and they would fall over, lol. Drop them in a pit full of rabid Enzyme 3s! That will teach em! lol
September 9, 200718 yr I do not think Warrior Guyver is redundant. I think it differentiates them from normal units. I like it. :)q
September 10, 200718 yr Who said wha now? Move house and been idle'ish for a month and just look what you miss Warrior Guyver is NOT a redundant name. : WG For life!
September 10, 200718 yr Author Hey, blame for what? I said from the beginning that But some fans have complained that the name Warrior Guyver is redundant because they think the Guyver is already a warrior. I just wanted to know what you all thought.
September 12, 200718 yr definitely not redundant, seeing as how the warrior project was started to create an unit especially fitted for warfare it would be totally applicable. Different story for say Nova but that reflects where they get their power.
September 12, 200718 yr It is possible that if the Nova Project was finished and won the competition, that they might have been known as Warrior units. Possibly Warrior Nova units.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.