Mirabilis

Dude that is pure epicness! I love that picture Ryuki!...In fact, when I get home I gonna make it my new desktop if you dont mind...I would also like to make it an avatar as well or such. Unless you dont want me to.

Heres a funny one I found about 4 years ago. I think its hilarous! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6onExG3Id8

I know. He was no match for the REAL godzilla in final wars

I liked Godzilla 1998. I thought the movie was cool and how they had the american government respond to the situation, and how the french government responded to it too. Heres my two cents on the film Things I liked: I LOVED its body structure. Though not the traditional Godzilla structure, I like how it was more dinosuarish, and how it moved around. I liked the idea of how it was laying eggs. It gave it a purpose to be in manhattan. I liked the battle sequences. and the car chase. I liked how it affected peoples lives differently. I liked its reaction to the death of its offspring. And I liked how they involved different branches of the military. Navy, Army etc. Things I didnt like: I didnt like how it couldnt breath fire. I didnt like how it died so easily by the Fighter Jets. I didnt like how no other animals, on the island didnt turn into giant creatures. That island should have been monster island!(They could have shown a breath little clipse of each monster before the bomb went off, like they did with the lizards. They could have shown like a gorilla=King Kong, showed a lobster=Ebyra, a sea horse next to a lizard swimming which would fuse into=Titanosurus, a moth=Mothra, a bat=Batra. etc: I did see a couple episodes in the Godzilla show, which I did like. I cant remember but couldnt he breath fire in the cartoon series following the 1998 film? Anyways they atleast had him fight other monsters in the cartoon series which I liked.

Well that is 1 reason why I do believe in creationism over evolution and other beliefs as well. But anyways, I am sorry that this discussion has turned into a "see who is smarter, and degrade the other person" sort of deal. I cant stress enough that I wasnt starting this discussion to say God is real. I didnt want this topic to be Creationism vs Evolution. I wanted this discussion to be, the theories and ideas of lifes origins. Not a debate but to see what ideas people could come up with. They didnt even have to be scientific or realisitic. Like saying "A bunch of fairies from a meotor created us when the meotor crashed on Earth." I wouldnt care, it would be just another cool theory. I shall retire from this discussion now, because I don't want anymore arguements to take place over a discussion that I created.

What series is this?

Man, I so remember this commercial on toonami,when it was played during the week. And even got the Altron Gundam. Man, these were the good-oh days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ltt2M_-SDo

One of my favorite Hiei AMV's.

Ah. I see, do you commission alot of drawings kenji?

You drew that yourself? Nice!!! If only I was that talented... But no, I can sketch things almost exactly the same, but I cant draw what things I see in my mind very well at all. Which stinks, because I cant show you all the cool things that I think of. I can only tell you about it with words. But nice drawing Kenji!

Senzu beans would'nt have been an awesome idea for that scene. Well I saw the film, saturday or sunday, and heres my two cents. I didnt like I also did'nt like However things I did like or thought was done well As a film it was ok, it wouldnt be one of my top favorites but it was descent. It actually did better then I expected it would be, I thought it would be another horrible attempt to make a show into a film, and would be another Guyver Movie. But remember, this is a film, they are limited to certain elements and things they can do, unlike a cartoon. I hope the 2nd one will be better if they make it.

Ok well I dont have like a college level of understanding. But my father taught me about it, and I learned about it in school. This is pretty much what I know: Darwin went out on some ship and was traveling the world and came to some ilsands. He wrote in his journal his findings of similar creature's that were living in different habitats, but the islands were close to each other. He continued his studies and his travels for I think it was a period of years or months? I dont remember how long it was, but anyways he came up with the idea of evolution through his studies. However, he was afraid at the time to publish his findings because at that time the power of the church was strong and if he did he thought he might get killed. But then someone else starting thinking the same thing, and he starting to publish it, so Darwin beat him to the punch. However, my Bio teacher told us that before he died that he announced that he made the concept of evolution all up. (I dont know if thats true or not) Thats the basic background that I have on Darwin Now as far as evolution itself. Evolution is the process of changing over a peroid of time, through adaptation eventually resulting in a new species. I have watched the DVD Scientific Discoveries "Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution." My dad told me that the Second Law of Thermal Dinamics "That any closed or open system tends toward disorder" would have to be broken for evolution to take place. Micro evolution is natural selection and adaptation with limited lasting effects to the genetic code. Macro evolution is what results in new species. This is pretty much what I know about this subject for evolution. I've studied Darwin and his theories, and the different ideas of evolution my sophmoore year. As I said before though I dont have a phd in it or anything like that. I am mainly curios to see ,what people belief, in the creation of life and the planet really. I am not here to tell you your wrong or to say "go read the bible you unbeleiver!" No, thats not why I opened this topic. I want to see all the different ideas on how the planet was formed and how life was created. Again as I said before what you believe is your own business, I am not here to say you are wrong or to judge you. I am only interested in all the different ideas of life's origins.

Of course you know hiei is always going to win. He's Hiei! He can never lose!

WOW! Thats cool kenji! I wish I had a guyver costume like that! Unfornately for me though, I wont be able to go as any character from my #1 favorite anime. No, i'll be going to Sanjapan most likely as captain han as I said before. I bet though that swirlingvortexofdoom and joan, and others will be taking pictures too. They probably load them up, but we'll see.

I still dont have a fovarite fight scene, maybe because they're al done so well? I dont know. But I did like it when Hiei and Kurama fought the members of Toguro's team.

I am sorry but I have to disagree with you zeo. Again if your belief is your own business and I am not going to think of anyone any less or degrade your belief's but can you elborate on this please, because this is how I see your comparison. You are comparing evolution to a picture of a man firing a gun. So saying this, are you saying that we went directly from primate to human? Please explain cause I do understand your point but I dont really see how it could be reality. Everyone knows that a gun fires a bullet that's common since, plus their isnt anything missing cause you have THE BULLET. The Bullet would be the missing link in that case. If you just had a gun and a deadman,without a bullet, you couldnt say the gun is what killed him. But with the bullet you have all the evidence and proof you need to say this is how he died. But here we don't have THE BULLET in evolution. In your statement with the case, the bullet would be the missing link from the gun fired, to create a dead man, you have to have something peirce him to kill him, hence the bullet. But in Evolution we dont have, the bullet, so therefore we dont have the proof to say we evolved. Their could be some evidence to suggest the we evolved, but there still inst the bullet, the proof. So I disagree with your statements and conclusion. That would be like saying, "I went to the zoo, and took a picture of a monkey. I then took a picture of my brother, though there wasnt a picture of the creature between the stages, we can conclude that we evolved from primates." Do you see my point? Can always count on you ryuki, for your wisdom! But yeah thats pretty much what I meant, perhaps I worded it wrong? Anyways, I know of stories of where different people tried to prove evolution by taking monkey skulls and putting human jaws on them, but those were all fonnies. If we did evolve from some sort of creature, then I am sure, no possitive! That we would have found the hybrid/missing link/ mix of of animal and human creatures. Again this is just discussion, not degrading believes or ideas. What you believe is what you want to believe. Not making fun of and belittleing anyone

Wow, cool man! Hope you enjoy your new merchandise! I didnt know that you posted your stuff on deviant art. Alot of my friends spend their time on that site, i'll have to tell them to look you up on that site

I believe life, Individuals that produce more viable offspring than others will eventually outbreed those other bloodline *** It is true that several species of hominid primate coexisted, or at least existed at the same time. And also that it is not entirely clear what caused the initial trend towards increased intelligence Thats because there is no evidence dictating that evolution has occured. Even before Darwin died, he said that he made up the whole concept of Evolution We did not specifically evolve from monkeys or apes because if such were true we would still be seeing evidence of evolution in the existing monkeys/apes and therefore have "missing links" walking about and socializing amongst us or with similar species. Seems a totally unwarranted conclusion. How is that? please explain "Me personally, I would have to agree with the old school style. Creationism. I understand that some people out there believed they came from apes or water or other various methods, but I dont understand why they would want to." Because of the all the evidence pointing that way? What evidence? There isnt a single shred of proof in the follsized record that say we evolved from some sort of animal. If there was we would have found its remains a long time ago. And their fossils would be more plentiful and easier to find then those of extinct dinosaurs, because they died before we evolved right? So then we should be able to find their bones, but we cant, and we never have before. So where is this "Evidence"? The believe of evolution is exactly that. Believe. It is really no different then the believe in religion. That is a believe. Until there is actualy proof in the fossil record, the theory of evolution will only be a theory, the same with the believe of creationism. "I would think that a person would want to believe that someone created them specificlly to love them and care for them; then believeing that they came from an animal and theres no purpose as to why they were born." What one wants is irrelevant to the facts. How is that, please explain. I dont understand what you mean. "I believe they think this because they are confused," This is what is known as a `gotspe´. "and dont want the responsibility that believers caring on them. For ex: In some religion's the believers are not to do anything that would be considered worldly. Viewing pornography, haveing premaritial sex, use of drugs etc. THese people might see this and say, "I dont want to have to follow those rules." So they dont believe, so they wont have to follow the rules." Could you please try to be a bit more conceited and insulting next time? Not trying to insult anyone, what you believe is your own business. This is just a discussion feel free to say what you want about your believes and ideas. We arnt trying to hurt anyone's feelings or degrade anyones believes "However this is just my opinion, I dont have any facts or anything like that." No drenn. Is this really nesiccary?

Man I need to see this film! Hiei at his full potential vs Yuske with his new powers! That will be awesome! Hiei will destroy all in his path!

Well my point is this, wheather or not they were TECHNICALLY given the order to kill each other or not, the characters still tried to kill each other in Gundam Wing several times. I could go on to say that Heero was told to stop the knew gundam (the second version of Winged Zero) and in a round about way, he was therefore ordered to kill the gundam and the pilot. So as you can see just because they tried to kill each other but failed to do so, doesnt mean that they only wanted to beat each other up and then stop. They tried to kill each other but were unsuccesful. Here's an example of how I see what your saying (I could be confused by what your saying, and if Iam please tell me so) Vegeta from DBZ went to earth to get a wish. He tried to get Goku to join him and the others,but Goku refuses. Vegeta then TRIED to kill him, but was defeated. He was unsuccesful at killing Goku,he only beat him up, that doesnt mean that he wasnt trying to kill him. It means that he wanted to kill him, he tried to kill him, and he failed to kill him. And it seems like to me (again I could be wrong) that you are saying durendal that Vegeta didnt REALLY want to kill him, he just wanted to beat him up. I am not trying to get anyone mad or upset. Iam just confused by some of your statements and am trying to understand what you are saying. If this is completely wrong please tell me so.

Here you go guys, this is the info that I got for the next DB/DBZ live action film. I will se this film most likely on friday. If I am still around.