Jess♥

I changed my method of working out to try and get a more accurate value for the volume of the body. I used an estimated radius of the body and used a cylinder as a dummy object. i used my own midriff as a basis for the radius (20cm) then compared to height to get XD midriff as well. i worked out the rough radius of the dummy cylinder by taking the expected density of teh human body and the height of myself vs my weight and some maths stuff. me height 175 cm radius 12 cm volume 79200 cm^3 weight 80 kg weight/height 80/79200 0.001010 that's approx 1.010g per cubic cm. guyver XD height 5200 cm radius 357 cm volume 2082880800 cm^3 weight 2690000 kg weight/height 2690000/2082880800 0.001291 that's 1.291g per cubic cm. i'd like to work out the others with htis level of accuracy, but i have to go gym at this moment. p.s. I've taken this off topic so I'll consider splitting it later. apologies for that. EDIT: adjusted to fit human density with that of water

i don't know about it being extremely light for its size. as far as weight to height ratio, as i worked it out, I would be 1.5 and XD is around 1.9. just so you know how i worked it out.. I actually used an abstract method so my numbers don't actually refer to any real world thing. the numbers are only useful as a direct comparison between the different forms of guyver. (and a human - me ) I can't use any real world data because i can't figure out the volume of a humanoid shape. so i took the volume of a cube that has the dimensions of the figure's height. so the actual number for each one, would be lower. because teh volume i was using is much higher.. only the compariosn would be ok because i used teh same ratio of cube for each figure. oh, and i shifted a few decimal places as well, because otherwise the numbers would be isane. don't worry i kept it uniform, I shifted teh same number decimal place for each subject. it's messy, but it's workable

how about - "ooh... well, technically she is naked.... boobies.."

actually. it's true. happiness can be found within even in that situation. usually when people have little or nothing to lose, they start to appreciate the simple things more. there is a book by viktor frankl, "man's search for meaning". it is about this persons life in a consentration camp and about how he turned it into a positive experience. people are in bad situations EVERYWHERE. Neither you or I could undestand everyones situation and we cannot fully understand how we might feel in that situation. the thing is though.. how we choose to view our situation is how we decide to feel about it. this is soething i have had a lot of experience with.. learning how to view my situation and how to control my emotions. I've got a long way to go, but i have turned my life around fro viewing my life situation with utter hopelessness to one of optemism and happiness. this also bleeds into what zeo has shared. I am happy at the moment. I don't feel that i don't deserve to be happy, or that i'm not entitled to it. I AM entitled to be happy. because hapiness is MY OWN EMOTIONAL STATE. nobody else has any right to dictate how i feel, because it is my own and nobody else. nobody can touch my emotions. nobody can give them to me and nobody can take them away. think about "the glass is half full" and "the glass is half empty". how i think determines how i feel and only i can choose to think one way or the other. I didn't have to earn my happiness. i chose my own criteria for being happy. people do that a lot. so if you feel that you have to work to be happy, that's your decision. that's your criteria for that emotional state. it's not always easy to create your own criteria, and the experience through our lives can get us into habits that can be so ingrained that we find it difficult to change our criteria for happiness. btw.. i don't know if this is truly what you were trying to say zeo, but pride/ego does not = happiness. pride/ego are blockades to happiness. because pride wil stop you from taking actions that will make you happier. like talking to your brother that you really miss but fell out with him. as human beings in full command of our internal state, we are entitled to ANYTHING and EVERYTHING. it is only ourself that can deny us those things which only we can give to ourself. to go into specifics... the man in guatemala may have seen his brother burned alive. that is only one aspect of his entire life! if you concentrate only on hte very worst things, the everything will seem terrible. but what else do we know about this man? he might have a very fortunate life. he may have people all around him who love him very much (there are many rich people who live in luxury who do not have anybody to love or who love them). his brothers resistance may have been an act that stopped the military from doing something worse like slaughtering teh entire family. his brother would have given such a sacrifice and the people would feel so happy simply to be alive although they would be sad.. that doesn't take away the gift he would have given them. if his last moments were to give them happiness it would be a waste to feel sad and desperate all the time his death would be wasted so they would look upon this scenario as the greatest of gifts and celebrate it. drenn happens to everyone. but if you concetrate on the drenn all the time, your entire exhistance will revolve around it.

a foetus goes through many stages. at early stages of foetal development there's not much to distinguish a human from fish. so it's hardly surprising that gender differences take a while to arise.

ok taking account of 3 dimensions.. i did some maths and my ratio is as follows - guyver gigantic is 1.95 height to weight ratio gigantic XD is 1.91 height to weight ratio. as a side note, I found it interesting to discover that Guyver 1 height weight ratio is 4.95. which suggests gigantic Guyver is incredibly less dense than normal guyver.

zeo, I'd like to understand your reason for saying XD is light for its size... because the way i worked it out, he is insanely heavy for his size. gigantic height to weight ratio is 1.45 whereas the XD height to weight ratio is 517.31 . if we take that ratio and apply it to Guyver 1.. normal Guyver 1... that would make him 90 tons. shouldn't XD be 7 tons? I dunno, it seems like maybe height to weight ratio doesn't work in this fashion? i mean.. i just checked on elephant, and a large elephant can weight 10 tons... so how does this work? I thik we have to work in 3 dimensions don't we? ok hold on....

or perhaps teh CM is simply that basic. the dual CM of the relic/gigantic is very advanced and showed itself capable of remodellng itself in an instant. from what we saw of Guyver 2 it seems teh normal CM cannot repair itself easily if at all. so when gigantic turned into XD, it seems to me that the dual CM remodelled the normal CM portion. so I think a normal CM would not repair itself but could be repaired if come into contact with a relic.

i disagree. I think we are entitled to be happy. I think hte approach is wrong. because happiness will only ever come from within. you can be happy in any situation, you just have to create that happiness from inside. the perfect phrase for this would be "happy as a pig in drenn". the pig is happy to wallow in drenn. nuff said.

thnks for that. i don't get that pavlovs cat... rings bell? the door bell? why would i ring the doorbel in relation to a cats food? I just can't understand it.

teh brain can repair itself from brain damage, can't it? and bones do mend themselves even without a cast or splint or whatever? teh alignment of the bone and the cast simply make it repair itself in a straight line. i mean.. if you leave it, it will mend but it will be a very messy mend. right? isn';t it the same as doing neat stitches? without neat stitches, your wound will still heal, it wil simply create an ugly scar.

i thik the appearance of the clone monster is based upon the human form. If it doesn't use human dna as the core, I do not think it would look like that.

agreed. yentsui can create wormhole type portals.. if his power could be 'boosted' by some power.. perhaps purgstals lightning.. then there is khans fade in/out style of teleport.. I don't think it makes sense for them to fly. we only saw one fly and it took him a while to fly. I think it would take a long time to fly around the planet. from arizona to japan... that'd take about 6-8 hours by plane. and if they wanted to fly i am sure they would simply take an aeroplane to conserve energy.. so i think time was of teh essence so i think their travel was near instant.

that's mental dude. i could write the exact same thing you wrote there. all of it. are you sure you're not my evil twin from hte mirror world?

there has to be a reason why teh shape is different and teh waist armour is more open. I expect this female Guyver would be more agile t hat male guyvers and less strong.

wow, nice collection, viz comics, figures, tv dvd, are those hk rip dvds? out of control dvd, 2nd film dvd, 12 part series on vhs!! impressive. chuangyi manga, kadokawa books, an italian book. am i right?

there are only 2 'rib structures' on Guyver 3. there were only 2 and a bit on Guyver 2. the armour structures are different on each guyver. the only real notable difference i can see with regards to cosistencies i hte armour.. is that the armour structure at teh side above the hips is missing. there may be others, it is good to study like this

what a load of crap... excuse me.. but I just think this is a load of codswallop. sure, the thing about the dna being similar etc is most likely true.. i'm not gonna argue any facts.. but when they dig up fossils, they don't have access to DNA so I don't believe they can use these classifications based on DNA. to say a chimp is human is like saying a dog is a cat. or like saying a ball is a tree. sure they can clasify is in 'homo' genus or whatever if it fits the classification... but they can't call it human. they can't check the DNA of every single creature that exhists.. classifications have always been based on morphology and shuold remain so.

i don't like those thumbnails. first of all they change too quick for me to read them. second of all, if they already started, it ruins the joke because you missed th start.

it's allowed. uhm... I don't think it's too bad to have more information. if a page appears too crowded, then a subpage can be made.. so if a certain robot has lots of information, you can make a page for that robot. but I guess there does have to be a balance. we have so little information about many many other things. I'm just happy that people are contributing information.

i edited top post to make a reference to your post guyverfanatic, since you always keep on top of these. hope this is ok with you super existence.

add as much as you like dude! as long as you are respecting what other people have created, it's all good.

i just had to say WOW, this is one impressive page!!!! nice work on this !!

This is the discussion topic for the wiki article: G Gundam Mechanical Listing

cannibal, those are great!! i realy LMAO IRL at those