V Guyver

Play Super Kim! edit: on the news big foot found. -_-0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmeYR_ZbAeg

the center of the control medal probably has an organic center. One that has nerves interfacing with the organism, and it's other nerves extend into the host. My theory is that the trauma from the explosion damaged the organism's interface with the control medal before it combined with lisker. Unlike sho who's survived lots of impacts and damage with his control medal, the Guyver unit of lisker wasn't reinforced because it didn't bond with a human before the damage... or am I just repeating obvious theories?

lol, wtf is with the politicaly incorrect use of wiskey with a child and the unsafe demonstration of sticking your hand in 1,000 degrees of boiling water. You could see he guys hand was re and blistering. XD

http://www.idkwtf.com/videos/latest-videos...ps-against-wall 7 seconds long and just silly.

http://www.gamevideos.com/video/id/10271 Asian street fighter TV series. I'm sure a couple of you have seen this already. But damn it's still funny. Especialy the Asian Balrog(M. Bison in Japan) and Asian Zangief.

There have only been 2 or 3 scenes of female nudity in the franchise. Nude mizuki with Aptom, nude Shizu, and the OVA movie with valkyrie's shower and bonding scene. That's over the span of over two decades. It's safe to say that he's not trying to go for sex appeal in his Manga unless you count the female (and gay dudes) point of view on the male characters.

It's possible that he wanted to avoid having giving the series a reputation for female nudity. It's something he didn't want attached to his real name, and why he did Zeorymer under a pen name. Well that's my theory at least.

I guess I was being narrow minded in my thought process about that. So sorry for causing you the trouble of having to explain it to me guys. I don't think brain size matters so much as how it functions. Scientists used to say that men were smarter then women because their brains tend to be smaller. I've read about birds, and how in some experiments revealed them to be capable of problem solving. In one case a common black crow (or was it a Raven?) that had a small bird sized basket of food inside a hole. The bird couldn't reach it but the basket did have a handle. What it did was shocking, it took a piece of metal, a small paper clip to be exact and bent it using it's beak and feet. Once it was bent enough, the bird picked it up with the beak and in turn used the now hooked shape paper clip to pull the basket out of the hole to get at the food. Some birds like pigeons have been used in tests to see them work on different shaped objects and boxes that had levers that would release food. Eventually they figured out how to use it too. Now keep in mind that a birds like that have brains no bigger then a grape or peanut. Yet many larger animals haven't shown that same capacity. Nature has a way of making compact and incredibly efficient organs and traits. Animals also have proven to be smarter then humans in many occasions since I have yet to see a Darwin Awards for animals. XD

Alright thanks for the explanation through I pointed out in my previous post that mimicry can't really be credited to a parent monkey as passing on knowledge to a new generation, that is entirely due to the offspring's interest. Also from what I understand, that interest doesn't show up often enough for it to allow them to develop anything, from what I remember in "What makes us Human?" whatever invention or discovery made by a chimp is rarely passed on, and if it does get passed on, usually it is eventually lost down the road. That experiment, I remember it was in popular science a few years ago. It's listed here below for those who want to read about it. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblo...mechanical-arm/ It was a pretty nifty experiment, but there was actually a similar one predating that one. Instead of a robotic arm they simply used a computer screen an a mouse to move things about on screen. Eventually they unplugged the mouse later down the road and the monkey's still managed to control the cursor on screen despite the unplugged mouse (which they had no idea it was unplugged).

Passing on knowledge from one generation to the next? Doesn't that usually involve teaching? I admit, I'm a bit dull of a lightbulb but that suggests teaching IMO. How else do you pass knowledge to the next generation? I understand genetically they could do so with encoded behaviour patterns, but I'm a bit confused by how else they can pass on what they learned without "teaching". Maybe one picks it up from mimicry from a parent using a tool it learned? But that is not often the case, and if it is the case then that means they aren't really purposely passing on that knowledge, and that means it's not a quality that they can claim or be attributed to them.

Love the "Raging vortex". Question Toku, do you use layers often or at all?

Zeo, you are mostly right. But there is one thing you got wrong. Chimps though capable of learning are incapable of teaching to their offspring what they've learned. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/apegenius/human.html I invite everyone to read the new above link I posted. It lists all the differences between us and chimps. Oh and on a side note... Chimps though remarkably like us lack abilities that other animals have in common like us. A Dog for example can do things a chimp can't point at things to try and show us something, but a dog can. A Dog can lead us somewhere, but chimps don't. That's a big critical differences because pointing and leading is a quality that has helped humans teach offspring, and for offspring to learn fast. After all, it's this same quality that has made dogs the most reliable animal companion to a human.

that second theory is cool. We also can't rule out the possibility of that Guyver units origins as being a separate experiment, not all that different from humans, probably on some far off planet.

Zoanoid: Heym it's a female guyver. She's scary and sexy. But I can beat here... oh wait a minute, she's taking off her bioboosted bra! I can't believe it, she's gonna flash me instead of fight me. *Nose bleeds, imagining woman boobs, but then get's vaporized by bathing light as she uses megasmasher.*

Well it is it's own organism, but I don't believe it was a bipedal warrior capable of squashing monsters originally. The Human mixed version was thanks to human DNA. Before that the organism probably was some parasite that merged with it's users for survival. It may or may not of increased any abilities, or possibly it could merge with the lifeform to sap energy yet gave some benefits to it's user before eventually overloading it's host. At some point the Advent discovered a way to make use of it better and bio-engineered it to be controlled with a control medal and balance out the benefits and remove most of the risks in using that life form.

That was actualy the Guyver Clone form. It's a story arc not found in any Animation adaptation, which sucks because it was a pretty cool arc. The Guvyer Clone is formed when the host is killed and some bioboosted flesh remains, such as the severed arm of Sho while fighting the Enzyme monster. After Sho died, the arm regenerated into a Clone of Sho. The clone could take Sho's form, but it didn't bioboost, instead it WAS the bioboosted armor itself seeking out the control medal for re-bonding. It didn't transform like Sho normally would either, instead it transformed in manner like a zoanoid. The plot was this, Sho once day after the fall of Chronos Japan HQ is trying to cope with his death, and that he himself is currently a clone to the original him. Meanwhile the regrown severed arm now turned Guyver Clone has taken Sho's form and begun following him by going to places Sho already visited. That means school, home, and running into people he knows. It eventually runs into Tetsuro (who is taken aback by the appearance of a Nude Sho (Clone is always naked) by questioning him "Look I know you had to sneak in here, but through the window? Hey wait why are you naked?" that promptly transformed and attacked him. Sho arrives and stops the monster, Agito becomes aware of the situation and appears to stop it too as it is a threat to his plans and identity. Sho stops Agito from killing the clone because Sho sees the clone revert to his human form. Agito is bemused and retorts to shot "Fine! Go ahead and go kill yourself..." and Sho begins to associate the Guyver Clone as the Ghost of the original Sho who died in battle with Enzyme. While thinking this The clone transforms again and attacks Sho from behind and tries to absorb Sho, while this is going on Agito becomes agitated at Sho and decides that the Guyver Clone is too dangerous and coldly decides to simply vaporize Sho and the clone to oblivion with the Megasmasher. But before he fires he notices that Sho is instead absorbing the clone thanks to the control medal. Agito stops his attack and leaves a confused and shaken Sho and Tetsuro as he murmurs to himself about it's good he didn't lose such an important pawn.

they were absorbing energy. I just have no clue as to hoe that energy expanded his form. Also have to wonder, does Sho himself grow with the suite? Or is it just the gigantic itself with a normal size Sho inside it somewhere?

Lisker was a guy that was bigger, stronger, and faster then Sho. Yet when it came down to it, it was combat skills that mattered. Maybe it's the same with females. Either males vs males (thus females vs females too) are equal no matter how they are fit, or males and females don't have a difference because of the suit. It can be either one. Though I honestly expected when I heard about how the Guyver function that difference in fitness & mass of the user would matter.

Oh my bad, I scimmed it and thought it had the english names. The Japanese names are not only cooler but more fun. Who can resist a Gundam named "Tequilla" Gundam. XD

Didn't someone say they had to be at a certain percentage of DNA that could classify and animal in the same Guinness? Not that Chimps are human, they clearly have major differences with us (incapable of teaching offspring any inventions or skills the parent may learn) and they sure as heck don't look like us. But genetically we are pretty similar. Not sure how this would change things in the way we look at them, but according to the article, some animal activists would have a field day using this saying "Don't hurt chimps, they are your fellow man" or something like that. I'd rather be more interested in the research between Ainu DNA and Japanese Samurai then chimps, at least that can break down a few barriers. But you have to admit, it's still an intresting little change and can lead to some great humor.

with all that energy surrounding them, the lighting could simply of been attracted to them or maybe Purgstall simply acted as a zoalord lighting rod. Who knows? I'm leaning towards it being a combined effort for instant teleportation.

Alright, so my theory is out of the bag. Could it simply be a macho mentality at Chronos?

the only two things I notice different is the obvious hips and umm.... chest plates?

I'm beginning to understand the real reason why the Creators feared humanity. It's not such more of the raw power that the Guyver produced nor the fact they couldn't control it. No, it's more likely because of people like Sho. Sho so far has show the ability to expand on the guyvers original abilities and create things. The fact the Creators spent billions of years creating biological weapons and didn't really seem thorough enough in just fixing the current models instead of restarting from scratch shows a lack of imagination. In retrospect, I think Sho created what the Creators feared, a much more deadly from of the Guyver that they couldn't match and counter, and made worse by the possibility of a zoanoid or zoalord getting their hands on one too. So there is very little right now stopping show from creating something bigger and better. For all we know, he may end up creating a new form of the basic Guyver unit while in the cocoon someday.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3744 It's 5 years old, this report I mean. Still I didn't come across it until today. It would be interesting to see people's reactions when (provided they do change it) they learn chimps are technically in the same species classification we are in instead of apes.