October 25, 20223 yr OHMYGODOHMYGODOHMYGOD!!!! *Squeals like a fangirl* Ahem, did not expect that to come in so soon.
October 25, 20223 yr Author Random thought, but I've been wondering, could this guy possibly be Psyklop? https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Psyklop_(Earth-616)
October 29, 20223 yr I think you got something there. But does that mean we might also get to see Psycho-Man?
October 29, 20223 yr Author Oh man, if that happens, it'd be a good back door for the FF to show up...
January 10, 20233 yr the first trailer inspired me more. This new trailer makes me feel a little underwhelmed. Still going to watch it of course. Edited January 10, 20233 yr by Tora Tan
January 11, 20233 yr 10 hours ago, durendal said: So what does Kang want with Antman? could be his strong connection with Cassie? I think that's the only think unique to him.
January 30, 20233 yr That is rather visceral dialogue. In terms of Marvel movies, that is possibly the most scary line I can think of.
January 31, 20233 yr oh my god that would be absolutely terrifying!!! I just never realised how dangerous Kang must be. I see him as a human, just a human, but then I guess he has all technology going on, so it makes sense. I'm going to look forward to what we get in this upcoming movie. I'll be there on release day as usual.
February 9, 20233 yr Author "You're not the one with the hammer?" I think Jonathan Majors is really gonna nail it as Kang.
February 17, 20233 yr I've seen it and I regret it. Antman 1 and 2 are fun films with good comedy. It's like they set out to make a serious MCU film then realised it was too serious and decided to try and inject some antman style humour into it, but it completely undermines what was there... Then they added what has become common MCU tropes into it... I don't want to do this any more. I reflect on the guardians holiday special and the past couple years of MCU products and I don't even think James Gunn could have managed to create something of beauty and purity. I think I may be done.
February 25, 20233 yr I wasn't able to see it last week due to scheduling conflicts, but managed to see it yesterday. I did enjoy the movie, but you are right that there is no oomph factor. Probably because although Ant-man is not an A+ character (in my opinion), but his setting is critical to jumpstart the next phase. I guess the movie would have been better if you've seen Loki, as that's the first appearance of Kang, which would make the first post credit scene make much more sense.
February 27, 20233 yr On 2/26/2023 at 2:32 AM, jerrygoodman said: Haven't seen it yet, but...how was Jonathan Majors as Kang? I would say the Kang in Quantumania has a totally different demeanor from He Who Remains (from Loki). So that says a lot about his acting. A little bit off from my expectations of Kang, but I feel he works.
April 2, 20232 yr 83 is not that good for a rotten tomatoes score. The scores may say something but the financial performance says a lot more. Quantumania had the biggest drop off out of all MCU movies so far.
April 3, 20232 yr That's what I meant. The critics deemed it rotten. I don't understand how the audience gave it 83% with that box office result.
April 4, 20232 yr I think Rotten Tomatoes users are generally more generous with their scores for some things. It is weird how the scores differ across the different review sites, with metacritic having it's highest scores in the 8's and Rotten Tomatoes having it's highest scores in the 90's. It's possibly due to how the score interface is presented to users, with Metacritic offering a straight 1 to 10 with a traffic light system, but Rotten Tomatoes offering a 5 star option with half stars available.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.