that guys first point,
information doesn't arise from dead matter....
well the precise pulse of a pulsar certainly arose from 'dead matter', so why not other complex patterns, such as snowflakes or other crystalline structures. to argue that, is to ignore all the experiments that have been done concerning the formation of amino acids etc.
it just so happens, that *this* form of patterns, and *this* for of chain reactions and *this* nucleic acid and *this* genetic sequence, resulted in a sapient life, however that is no grounds to assume that other patterns, chain reactions, nucleic acids or gene sequences could not have yielded sapient life.
information requires a designer...
my eyes receive information in the form of light. my eyes measure that information and make judgements based on that information. that information does not have to have been designed. information does not need a designer. designs need a designer. something which is clearly not present in the clumsy forms that we see in nature.
It's wonderful to see the religious people getting a chance to fully articulate their views. it's saddening on the other hand, to see the scientists getting cut off every time they start to make a point.
That guy in the glasses is starting to make me angry.
I think the other scientist dude got it spot on. scientists are willing to change their mind. some theories are a bit like dogma.. some scientists can get a bit too passionate, but the religious guys just seem to be ignorant.
it is an interesting program. though it seems familiar. I think I may have seen it before.
I shan't watch it all now, I may continue it later.