tdog

plus tetsuo doesnt do anything because hes also A KID!!! these monsters are super powered would you like to tell me where hes gonna get a 50 caliber rifle. let alone learn how to use it lol jesus christ. plus tetuso isnt ment to do any fighting as much as he would probably like to. hes the conscience of the series in both series actually hes also the point of logic in many scenes pointing out things. in many ways hes a remote viewer much like the audience. murakami had to get his gun from someone else even then its custom made to kill zoianoids and he has to rely on his psychic abilites to help him almost every time he gets into a situation so what makes you think tetsuo is gonna be of any use other then just get in the way. This person who reviewed this is kind of a idiot. You just want everyone to kill monsters and have no weaknesses, the point of the guyver getting hurt from zoianoids is just that, it can be hurt its not a god lke weapon. it has weaknesses many actually, and thats what makes it interesting to watch the guyver isnt a undeafeatble killing machine, it can be matched, what makes it better is the user. its not about the battles, its about how hard sho fights, how hard agito fights, its about in-surmounting odds and over coming them. plus sho couldnt come close to giving away chronos because its clearly indicated that chronos owns everything. they are everywhere, they own the news, the cops, the press. they own everything. and the people who arent under their influence would just be killed. so going out in public and exposing your self as the guyver does nothing but give the innocent people around giant targets on their backs lol. If they can turn a whole town into zoanoids lol. who ever posted why guyver sucks is a smegging idiot. omg, they have no clue how writing works, sure the series isnt perfect nothing is. but what your sighting it for is just stupid. if your gonna say why something sucks you better have some damn good reasons, and do some smegging research before posting idiotic bullshit. "i hate when characters dont train" well Im sorry that not everyone is smegging naruto or ichigo from bleach, sometimes the hero doesnt have time for that. sometimes the badguys are actually really good at being badguys and trying to kill the good guy lol. get out of here with your stupid bullshit.... guyver sucks you know what you suck!

ok for starters sho is a whiny bitch because his whole life has been ruined. any plans he had, any dreams or hopes of college or growing old perhaps dating mizuki or anything that resembles a somewhat normal life is gone. he will spend the rest of his days looking over his shoulders constantly aware that there is a evil organization that has tried to kill him any which way they can I mean for smeggs sake they made him kill his own dad.... Im going to assume in real life if you as a teenager were forced to kill your dad and he got turned into a horrifying monster you might be kind of depressed. Plus sho isnt a badass, its kind of told to us from the beginning in the manga and both anime adaptations that sho is a wuss, he is a regular teenager who cant even talk to mizuki let alone have her see his back were the two marks are. Hes a shy easily intimidated kid, so of course hes also get his ass handed to him in fights. and what training are you talking about in what time frame is he ever gonna be able to set aside loads of free time to train, they are kidnapping his friends, his family anyone they can to constantly put him on his feet moving. What little time sho got to train in the original OVA was from agito and that was bland because well lets see they tricked sho with a mizuki clone. the point of sho becoming the guyver is that he isnt a badass at all. he gets smegged up and hurt alot because hes A KID. Agito has had years of training so he knows very well how to defend him self even without the armor. The animation not be amazing either but the original ova came out in 1991 lol all ova series at the time didnt have the best animation lol. most of your complaints stem from inherit character traits within sho as a person for the series. Hes not ment to be the things you want, hes a highschool kid whos afraid and has no clue what to do and is just learning how to use the guyver. The whole motif of that is pretty straight forward when shos brain gets damaged with his father/enzyme 2 fight. once sho is removed from the suit psychologically it becomes a killing machine. Sho has to be those things because hes the relatable character for the audience. if sho didnt act that way or wasnt portrayed that way then there would be zero suspense, he has to be afraid and whiny because hes a normal person outside of whats going on. If sho was a badass and can easily handle chronos then there would be no point and the show would be boring as smegg. Nothing is better in classic story telling then watching the hero come close to losing and winning the battle by a narrow margin thats just writing basics 101. But as the show progresses Sho does actually learn from his battles in the end of the OVA he proved that hes actually a better guyver then agito, he was more inventive on his feet plus he over came the odds and used almost every weapon in his arsenal. then he did something no other guyver host had done up to that point he fired the megasmasher without the use of his arms. plus sho also got killed and came back to smegging life... hes a character that learns through experience. and he becomes a tougher character by the end having vowed to avenge his father and decides that no matter what he will no longer run away, he will fight them head on and take them down. thats what most people call a character arc, and sho has a good one by the end of the series hes a completely different person who basically grew up. Not all heroes are complete badasses, a truly great hero is someone who has flaws and learns from them which sho does. I feel like you missed out on alot of things within the original OVA, especially when it came to examining character arcs. your generalizing things so much without doing proper in depth analysis.