Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 years later...
Posted
Plus, I think you should comment on his video if you feel inclined to do so. I tried to point out his flaw in his argument, but he just blocked me.

 

Just noticed this. You got into it with Ed Boon? One of the founding fathers of MK? :nosebleed: ouch

Posted
Plus, I think you should comment on his video if you feel inclined to do so. I tried to point out his flaw in his argument, but he just blocked me.

 

Just noticed this. You got into it with Ed Boon? One of the founding fathers of MK? :nosebleed: ouch

No, I got into it with the reviewer, The4thSnake.

 

It would be funny just to see Ed's reaction to the horrendous nit picky review.

Posted (edited)
Plus, I think you should comment on his video if you feel inclined to do so. I tried to point out his flaw in his argument, but he just blocked me.

 

Just noticed this. You got into it with Ed Boon? One of the founding fathers of MK? :nosebleed: ouch

No, I got into it with the reviewer, The4thSnake.

 

It would be funny just to see Ed's reaction to the horrendous nit picky review.

 

I think the video has a lot of good points. It would be funny to see Ed to have seen that debate.  :lol: 

Edited by Jupiter Knight
Posted
Plus, I think you should comment on his video if you feel inclined to do so. I tried to point out his flaw in his argument, but he just blocked me.

 

Just noticed this. You got into it with Ed Boon? One of the founding fathers of MK? :nosebleed: ouch

No, I got into it with the reviewer, The4thSnake.

 

It would be funny just to see Ed's reaction to the horrendous nit picky review.

 

I think the video has a lot of good points. It would be funny to see Ed to have seen that debate.  :lol:

 

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that. There are some points that were good, but I do forget what they were since it has been a while since I've watched it.

 

Most of his points were just meaningless nitpicking. Though easily his worse complaint is Quan Chi. I wouldn't mind so much if it wasn't for the fact that he thinks Quan Chi came from Defenders of the Realm. The fact that he said he started with MK: Deadly Alliance explains it though. He wasn't paying attention when Quan Chi was popping in every gaming magazine promoting MK 4 long before his 'debut' in Defenders of the Realm. Which might I add, DotR wasn't a reliably aired cartoon in the States.The first time I encounter Quan Chi(in an actual product) was MK Mythologies: Sub-Zero.

 

Plus, I don't get why he would favor Shang Tsung over Quan Chi when it was Quan who started the Deadly Alliance and found Onaga's Undead Army. I would get this whole 'knockoff' of Shang Tsung if he start with the original trilogy like I have, but he started with Deadly Alliance.

 

Also, I'd hardly call this a review when he barely talked about the gameplay and mostly looked at the plot.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...