March 22, 200719 yr Every one I've seen the first trailer for the live action eva movie and uhh is all I can say. Here's a run down on what I got from it. Shinji will be and this is a fact so eww will be played by the guy who played as Frodo from LOTR Asuka shall be played by and I wanna puke every time I think about it will be done by the girl who plays as Herrmoni(sp?) you know the annyoing girl from the Harry Potter flicks. *Largo shivers in his seat just thinking of it.* Also the fight sceans from what I can tell will look alot like the animation from Mobile Suit Gundam Evolve and if you haven't seen this the next closesest example is the Gundam movie G-Savior I can't believe I said it I have to puke now so that's all for now. Oh I hope it doesn't suck like G-Savior.
March 22, 200719 yr Not too big into EVA. I wish someone would make another Guyver movie and do it right. Just can we exclude anything from book 24 up in this one? Man... I want what Takaya must be smoking!
March 22, 200719 yr Guyver 2: Dark Hero wasn't that bad. Some parts are lame, but it has redeeming qualities over the first one, that's for sure.
March 22, 200719 yr Author True the 2nd guyver movie was really cool, but I'm talking about animes made in to live action as a whole see what I'm getting at here?
March 22, 200719 yr No.... I guess not, I've only seen the Guyver ones and can't really think of any others.
March 22, 200719 yr LoL Largo just saw the vid on youtube glad to say it's a fake it's just some computer animation mixed in with a bunch of clips from different movies
March 23, 200719 yr Author UHHH hey I'm not so sure about that if you go to animenewsnetwork.com they seem very convincing.
March 23, 200719 yr You never know. I still think "Batman: Dead End" rocked and would have made a better movie than "Batman Begins".
March 23, 200719 yr Ugh, they mutilated the origin story. Why couldn't they just go with Batman Year One instead?
March 25, 200718 yr Because they just had to have Liam Neeson in it. Plus the whole "Oh tie the main villain to the overall story!" bit. They probably thought they had to do it that way. I mean think of the first Batman movie, they had the Joker kill Batman's parents as opposed to "Some unknown and faceless criminal." That event is what created the driving force behind the character. It's what made him want to be a crime fighter in the first place, and it's what created "the never ending battle". If the Joker killed his parents, than the Batman only needs to kill the joker in order to avenge their deaths. Once that's done there's nothing to really keep him going. The nameless thug forces the perpetual story. Yet they changed that and people still hold the film in high regard. Eh, it could have been worse...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.