Who is more immortal a Guyver or a Zoalord?

[Guest]

The reason i am asking this question is because at the moment at least 2 zoalords have survived aganist the odds! Namely Gyou and Imakarum.

At first I compared a Zoalords Zoa-crystal to a Guyvers cm, but a Guyver cannot survive without a cm, yet Gyou is without a Zoa-crytal and did have a hole blasted through his chest?

It is likely that if a Guyvers cm is damaged it is beyond repair, yet Alkanphel can now repair his Zoa-crystals in his creator processing tank and speed up the process using the Ark!

So who is more immortal?

[Andersong]

Very good point but I think that both are equal in that sence, both were created to be fail safe and both to be very powerful, I think that they were just two different copies of the same hardware. In my Opinion

[Guest]

I moved this to the scientist zone because:

a-this has not been clearly stated in the manga

b-this is more of a sciency question

First off, it's only speculation that the guyver is even imortal. That may just be a fan interpretation, so might not even be official. Then again, in the anime, Sho said 'for a guyver never dies'. Take that as you will.

True, Murikami came back to life as Imakarum. But Alkanphel had to engineer this process. There was nothing about Murikami that did it on it's own. For all intents and purposes, he was dead until Alkanphel reprocessed him.

Guyot did take damage, and did survive without his zoacrystal, but he's still not even completely healed. It's probebly been a year since he was trashed, and he's still recovering. Back in an earlier fight when he brought out the Enzyme II's, he had Barcus help heal him. Who knows if he had help recovering from this too.

The Guyver on the other hand. It's entire body with the exception of the control metal has been obliterated, and in a matter of a day is restored. It is self contained healing, restores everything, and is much faster. My bet is on guyver.

Though I agree that both zoa and boost armor are cousin technologies.

[McAvoy]

In terms of a lifespan, I think the Guyver is more 'immortal' than a Zoalord is. The way i see it is that the zoalord is still more or less like a human being. The only difference is that their bodies have been enhanced. Since the Guyver can practically regenerate it's entire body, and and body part, I would think that the Guyver can never die unless the Control Medal is either damaged or malfunctions.

Now in terms of durability, both of them apparently have their ups and downs. Zoalords seems to be just far slower in regenerating any parts of their body. Take a look at Murakami, he was able to regenerate his body through some help. But that was all him. Now but that was not a major organ, like a heart or lungs.

[*Jess♥]

sorry to douse the flames but neither are 'immortal'.

the definition of immortal is 'unable to die'. We have seen a guyver die(guyver2), and we have seen a zoalord die(purgstal).

Maybe the question should be 'which is most durable'.

guyver seems to be more durable as has already been said. from just a tiny fragment it can reproduce itself. a zoalord couldn't.

how much damage would it take to kill a zoalord outright? purgstal was killed by a hole in his chest.(yes i know, along with a long draining fight)

how much damage to kill a guyver? The ONLY thing that can kill a guyver that we know of is EXTREME trauma to the CM.

such a small achiles heal with such a powerful defensive array surely makes for most durability.

[Guest]

This, although interesting, is quite an unfair topic since the guyver is a bond between two seperate beings and a Zoalord, although retaining a human form, is a zoalord through and through. both can be reprocessed to fully functional states as long as their core remains (Control medal for a Guyver and Zoacrystal for a Zoalord). A zoalord requires a processing tank and a Bio-boosted human uses the defence system of the guyver organism itself

Both are pretty much equal in durability but as drag-5 pointed out neither can possibly be immortal since both have died.